Have a legal question? How to get a precise, cited answer

Iranian statutes are amended constantly; an article written years ago may describe repealed law — the Cheque Issuance Act alone has changed fundamentally several times.

General chatbots have a different problem: they answer from model memory, not statute text. Article numbers or their content can be invented, and you have no way to tell. In law, one wrong citation can mean a lost deadline or a lost right.

The more precise the question, the more reliable the answer. Instead of asking what to do about a troublesome neighbor, write: the upstairs neighbor occupied the building's common area without consent and built a storage room; I have the assembly minutes and photos; what legal action can I take?

Always include three things: the facts with dates and amounts, the evidence you hold, and what you want (money, eviction, an injunction, prosecution). If you know a relevant statute or article, mention it.

A good answer has three marks: it cites a specific article, the text of that article is available for you to read yourself, and when there is no clear legal basis it honestly says so instead of inventing one.

In Dadyar every answer is built from a live search of the legal corpus, every citation is checked against the real article text before display, and unverified citations are never shown. The research trail is visible too — you see which statutes were searched.

The spectrum is wide: public articles are free but unguaranteed; an in-person lawyer session has a substantial fee. The sensible middle for most questions is an instant cited answer: Dadyar is free to start (gift credits, no payment needed) and each question only consumes credits for the work it actually does.

For serious matters — a case headed to court, large sums, criminal accusations — continue the same conversation with a licensed lawyer; the fee is transparent and fully refundable until the session starts.